|
Investigating the Alignment of High School and Community College Assessments in California
 |
Introduction |
The California Community College system is the largest system of higher
education in the world. Its 72 districts and 109 campuses served more than 2.5
million students in the 2005–2006 academic year. According to the California
Community Colleges Chancellor’s Web site (www.cccco.edu), the “…primary
missions of the Colleges are to offer academic and vocational education at the
lower division level for both recent high school graduates and those returning
to school. Another primary mission is to advance California’s economic
growth and global competitiveness through education, training, and services
that contribute to continuous workforce improvement.” In addition, the
Strategic Plan for the California Community Colleges lists the missions of
the community college system as transfer education, basic skills and English
language proficiency instruction, economic and workforce development,
lifelong learning, and providing associate’s degrees and certificates (California
Community Colleges, 2006). The Strategic Plan also lists several strategic
goals for the community college system. These include: increase college
awareness and access; promote student success and readiness; strengthen
partnerships for economic and workforce development; improve system
effectiveness; and provide enhanced resources. This study focuses on only one
aspect of these multiple objectives and that is the goal of promoting student
success and readiness by evaluating the system of evaluating and placing
students into community college courses.
As a result of the open access policy in place at community colleges in
California, not all of the students who enroll are prepared for the academic
rigors of college-level work. A recent study from the Institute for Higher
Education Leadership & Policy concludes that the open access policies of
California’s community colleges have succeeded in enhancing enrollments,
but have had the unintended consequence of inhibiting college completion
(Shulock & Moore, 2007). They argue that since only one in four degreeseeking
community college students actually earns a certificate or degree,
transfers to a four-year university, or achieves some combination of those
outcomes within six years of enrolling in a community college, policies should
be changed to encourage better educational outcomes rather than simply
focusing on allowing students to enroll.
Additional data offer further support to the argument that many students
enrolling from high school into community colleges in California are
unprepared for college-level coursework. For example, the strategic planning
research report entitled, Environmental Scan: A Summary of Key Issues Facing
California Community Colleges Pertinent to the Strategic Planning Process stated,
“A recent survey of California community college placement test results
indicated that only about 9% of students place in transfer level math and
about 27% of students place in transfer level English…over 70% of students
place in remedial math and 42% place in remedial English” (Research and
Planning Group for California Community Colleges, 2005, p. 6). This means
that the vast majority of students are initially placed in courses for which
they will not receive credit at a California State University or University of
California campus if and when they choose to transfer.
Having such large numbers of students take remedial courses is not
without consequence. Students who start out in the remedial levels of math
and reading courses have limited probability of attempting transfer level
courses at the community college. The likelihood of attempting a transfer
level English course after beginning in a reading fundamentals course at the
community college is only 25% (Research and Planning Group for California
Community Colleges, 2005). The numbers are more dismal for mathematics.
The likelihood of taking a transfer level math course after starting in a basic
level math course is only 10%. The Research Group report says, “Empirical
evidence suggests that those who begin at the lowest levels of basic skills
are unlikely to achieve a degree or transfer to a university” (p. 6). Given this
evidence, there is reason to be concerned about the fact that one in every three
students in the community colleges enrolls in a basic skills class.
|