
|
|

Page 8 of 10
|
|
 |
Endnotes |
- 1
|
U.S. General Accounting Office, College Savings Information on
State Tuition Prepayment Programs (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing
Office, 1995) |
- 2
|
U.S. General Accounting Office, Report on Student Debt Burdens
(Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1998). |
- 3
|
These figures are based on enrollment, income and tuition data from
the 1995-96 academic year and on projections provided by the U.S. Department of Education
(see Appendix,
Tables 1 and 2). |
- 4
|
New York, for instance, provides its residents with need-based financial
aid through its Tuition Assistance program. Under this state entitlement program,
which costs about $630 million annually, New York families with a dependent student
enrolled in a four-year public college would not be eligible for the maximum HOPE
tax credit unless their taxable income is between $45,000 and $80,000. Based on national
averages, most families would be eligible for the full HOPE tax credit if their annual
taxable income is between $40,000 and $80,000. In response to this situation, the
New York State Higher Education Services Corporation has recommended studying whether
changes can be made in the state program so that federal funds can be used rather
than state funds. |
- 5
|
In 1978, President Carter worked to develop and pass the Middle Income
Student Assistance Act (MISAA). The plan increased the maximum income allowable to
receive a Pell grant, and expanded eligibility for and removed the income ceiling
from subsidized student loans. The interest rate was such a bargain that House
and Garden magazine printed an investment article, "How you can make a substantial
profit from a student loan." Federal costs for the program soon exploded, and
three years later, in 1981, Congress instituted a needs test for the guaranteed student
loan program, whereby students with family incomes above $30,000 were limited to
borrowing no more than the difference between their educational costs and their expected
family contribution. |
- 6
|
For example, the Minnesota Higher Education Services Office has studied
the interaction of federal Pell grants, Minnesota state grants, and the federal HOPE
tax credit. Their analysis used current academic year tuition and fee data and the
Minnesota living and miscellaneous expense allowance, and eligibility requirements
for state-sponsored scholarships to calculate how the cost of attendance is shared
by the taxpayer (through federal and state financial aid), the student, and the family. |
|
7
|
This recommendation is directed to those states that generally conform
their state tax codes to federal deductions of income. Those states that have broad
definitions of income (with few exclusions, deductions, exemptions, or credits) should
not conform to the federal tax code. |
|
|
DOWNLOAD | PREVIOUS
| NEXT
|
|

© 1998 The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
|
|