||THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND HIGHER EDUCATION
152 North Third Street, Suite 705, San Jose, California 95112
The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education promotes public policies
that enhance Americans’ opportunities to pursue and achieve high-quality education and
training beyond high school. As an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, the
National Center prepares action-oriented analyses of pressing policy issues facing the
states and the nation regarding opportunity and achievement in higher education—
including two- and four-year, public and private, for-profit and nonprofit institutions. The
National Center communicates performance results and key findings to the public, to
civic, business, and higher education leaders, and to state and federal leaders who are
poised to improve higher education policy.
Established in 1998, the National Center is not affiliated with any institution of
higher education, with any political party, or with any government agency; it receives
continuing, core financial support from a consortium of national foundations that includes
The Pew Charitable Trusts, The Atlantic Philanthropies, and The Ford Foundation.
Telephone: 408-271-2699 • FAX: 408-271-2697
National Center Publications
The National Center publishes:
The following National Center publications—as well as a host of other information and
links—are available at www.highereducation.org. Single copies of most of these reports
are also available from the National Center. Please FAX requests to 408-271-2697 and
ask for the report by publication number. Measuring Up 2000 is available by calling 888-
- Reports and analyses commissioned by the National Center,
- Reports and analyses written by National Center staff,
- National Center Policy Reports that are approved by the National Center’s Board
of Directors, and
- CrossTalk, a quarterly publication.
State Policy and Community College–Baccalaureate Transfer, by Jane V. Wellman
(August 2002, #02-6). Recommends state policies to energize and improve higher
education performance regarding transfers from community colleges to four-year
Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education: The Early Years (June 2002,
#02-5). The Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) attained
remarkable success in funding innovative and enduring projects during its early years.
This report, prepared by FIPSE’s early program officers, elaborates on how those results
Losing Ground: A National Status Report on the Affordability of American Higher
Education (May 2002, #02-3). This national status report documents the declining
affordability of higher education for American families, and highlights public policies
that support affordable higher education. Provides state-by-state summaries as well as
The Affordability of Higher Education: A Review of Recent Survey Research,
by John Immerwahr (May 2002, #02-4). This review of recent surveys by Public
Agenda confirms that Americans feel that rising college prices threaten to make
higher education inaccessible for many people.
Coping with Recession: Public Policy, Economic Downturns and Higher Education,
by Patrick M. Callan (February 2002, #02-2). Outlines the major policy considerations
that states and institutions of higher education face during economic downturns.
Competition and Collaboration in California Higher Education, by Kathy Reeves
Bracco and Patrick M. Callan (January 2002, #02-1). Argues that the structure of
California’s state higher education system limits the system’s capacity for collaboration.
Measuring Up 2000: The State-by-State Report Card for Higher Education (November
2000, #00-3). This first-of-its-kind report card grades each state on its performance in
higher education. The report card also provides comprehensive profiles of each state and
brief states-at-a-glance comparisons. Visit www.highereducation.org to download
Measuring Up 2000 or to make your own comparisons of state performance in higher
education. Printed copies are available for $25.00 by calling 888-269-3652 (discounts
available for large orders).
Beneath the Surface: A Statistical Analysis of the Major Variables Associated
with State Grades in Measuring Up 2000, by Alisa F. Cunningham and Jane V.
Wellman (November 2001, #01-4). Using statistical analysis, this report explores
the “drivers” that predict overall performance in Measuring Up 2000.
Great Expectations: How the Public and Parents—White, African American and
Hispanic—View Higher Education, by John Immerwahr with Tony Foleno (May 2000,
#00-2). This report by Public Agenda finds that Americans overwhelmingly see higher
education as essential for success. Survey results are also available for the following
Supplementary Analysis for Measuring Up 2000: An Exploratory Report, by
Mario Martinez (November 2001, #01-3). Explores the relationships within and
between the performance categories in Measuring Up 2000.
Some Next Steps for States: A Follow-up to Measuring Up 2000, by Dennis
Jones and Karen Paulson (June 2001, #01-2). Suggests a range of actions that
states can take to bridge the gap between state performance identified in
Measuring Up 2000 and the formulation of effective policy to improve
performance in higher education.
A Review of Tests Performed on the Data in Measuring Up 2000, by Peter
Ewell (June 2001, #01-1). Describes the statistical testing performed on the data
in Measuring Up 2000 by the National Center for Higher Education Management
Recent State Policy Initiatives in Education: A Supplement to Measuring Up
2000, by Aims McGuinness, Jr. (December 2000, #00-6). Highlights education
initiatives that states have adopted since 1997–98.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes: A Supplement to Measuring Up 2000,
by Peter Ewell and Paula Ries (December 2000, #00-5). National survey of state
efforts to assess student learning outcomes in higher education.
Technical Guide Documenting Methodology, Indicators and Data Sources for
Measuring Up 2000 (November 2000, #00-4).
A State-by-State Report Card on Higher Education: Prospectus (March 2000,
#00-1). Summarizes the goals of the National Center’s report card project.
Great Expectations: How Pennsylvanians View Higher Education (May 2000,
Great Expectations: How Floridians View Higher Education (August 2000, #00-
Great Expectations: How Coloradans View Higher Education (August 2000, #00-
Great Expectations: How Californians View Higher Education (August 2000,
Great Expectations: How New Yorkers View Higher Education (October 2000,
Great Expectations: How Illinois Residents View Higher Education (October
State Spending for Higher Education in the Next Decade: The Battle to Sustain
Current Support, by Harold A. Hovey (July 1999, #99-3). This fiscal forecast of state
and local spending patterns finds that the vast majority of states will face significant
fiscal deficits over the next eight years, which will in turn lead to increased scrutiny of
higher education in almost all states, and to curtailed spending for public higher
education in many states.
South Dakota: Developing Policy-Driven Change in Higher Education, by Mario
Martinez (June 1999, #99-2). Describes the processes for change in higher education that
government, business, and higher education leaders are creating and implementing in
Taking Responsibility: Leaders’ Expectations of Higher Education, by John
Immerwahr (January 1999, #99-1). Reports the views of those most involved with
decision-making about higher education, based on a survey and focus groups conducted
by Public Agenda.
The Challenges and Opportunities Facing Higher Education: An Agenda for Policy
Research, by Dennis Jones, Peter Ewell, and Aims McGuinness (December 1998, #98-
8). Argues that due to substantial changes in the landscape of postsecondary education,
new state-level policy frameworks must be developed and implemented.
Higher Education Governance: Balancing Institutional and Market Influences, by
Richard C. Richardson, Jr., Kathy Reeves Bracco, Patrick M. Callan, and Joni E. Finney
(November 1998, #98-7). Describes the structural relationships that affect institutional
effectiveness in higher education, and argues that state policy should strive for a balance
between institutional and market forces.
Federal Tuition Tax Credits and State Higher Education Policy: A Guide for State
Policy Makers, by Kristin D. Conklin (December 1998, #98-6). Examines the
implications of the federal income tax provisions for students and their families, and
makes recommendations for state higher education policy.
The Challenges Facing California Higher Education: A Memorandum to the Next
Governor of California, by David W. Breneman (September 1998, #98-5). Argues that
California should develop a new Master Plan for Higher Education.
Tidal Wave II Revisited: A Review of Earlier Enrollment Projections for California
Higher Education, by Gerald C. Hayward, David W. Breneman, and Leobardo F.
Estrada (September 1998, #98-4). Finds that earlier forecasts of a surge in higher
education enrollments were accurate.
Organizing for Learning: The View from the Governor’s Office, by James B. Hunt Jr.,
chair of the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, and former governor
of North Carolina (June 1998, #98-3). An address to the American Association for
Higher Education concerning opportunity in higher education.
The Price of Admission: The Growing Importance of Higher Education, by John
Immerwahr (Spring 1998, #98-2). A national survey of Americans’ views on higher
education, conducted and reported by Public Agenda.
Concept Paper: A National Center to Address Higher Education Policy, by Patrick M.
Callan (March 1998, #98-1). Describes the purposes of the National Center for Public
Policy and Higher Education.