Download
PDF Version
 
Executive Summary
 
Acknowledgments
 
Introduction
 
The Importance of 2/4 Transfer
 
The Different Dimensions of Transfer
 
The Accountability Problem and Transfer “Rates”
 
Research on State Policy and Transfer
 
Six-State Focus
 
    Arkansas
 
    Florida
 
    New Mexico
 
    New York
 
    North Carolina
 
    Texas
 
Lessons Learned about State Transfer Policy
 
Conclusions and Recommendations
 
References
 
State Resources
 
About the Author
 
The Institute for Higher Education Policy
 
The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
 

home   about us   news   reports   crosstalk   search   links    



Page 8 of 21

SIX-STATE FOCUS


To examine the impact of state policy structure on 2/4 transfer, I selected six states that rely heavily on transfer as a point of access to the baccalaureate degree for low-income students. The criteria for selection included the states’ grades on completion in Measuring Up 2000 (National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2000), combined with the proportion of total postsecondary enrollments in community colleges and the percentage of school-age children in poverty.* Three of these states—Florida, New York, and North Carolina—were among the better-performing states on the completion measure used in Measuring Up 2000; three others—Arkansas, New Mexico, and Texas—were among the poorest-performing states (see table 3). Arizona and California were not selected, despite sizable community college sectors, because they both obtained midrange completion scores in Measuring Up.

As one measure of 2/4 transfer effectiveness, this six-state survey compared Integrated Postsecondary Education System (IPEDS) data for first-time freshmen enrollments in degree-producing institutions in fall 1991 with baccalaureate degree recipients in 1996– 97 (see table 4). While these cohorts are not identical, the comparisons show how the states differ in the relative diversity of enrollments and in degree attainment by racial and ethnic groups, with much higher populations of Hispanic students in Florida, New Mexico, New York, and Texas than in Arkansas and North Carolina. More importantly, there are disturbing and consistent patterns indicating that white students persist to the baccalaureate degree at higher rates than either African-American or Hispanic students.


* Grades on the completion measure reflect the two persistence measures and two completion measures shown in table 3. These measures are not considered proxies for transfer effectiveness, but they do capture some aspects of transfer performance, since all entering community college students are included in the base of one persistence measure, and all degree completers who started in a community college are captured in the completion measures. The other factors-the proportion of students in public community colleges and the percentage of school-age children in poverty-narrow the focus to states that use public community colleges as a point of low-cost access to postsecondary education.

DOWNLOAD | PREVIOUS | NEXT

National Center logo
© 2002 The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
and the Institute for Higher Education Policy

HOME | about us | center news | reports & papers | national crosstalk | search | links | contact

site managed by NETView Communications